Notebookcheck

Test: Xplore Technologies XSLATE L10 (Pentium N4200, FHD) Surfplatta (Sammanfattning)

Allen Ngo (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), 07/24/2018

Modern och robust. En hård surfplatta som har allt man kan förvänta sig från en konsumentmodell och mer därtill. Xplore XSLATE L10 använder samma processor som dom senaste Ultrabook-modellerna och har NFC, LTE och till och med ett löstagbart batteri samt en HDMI-port i fullstorlek.

Xploretech XSLATE L10
Processor
Intel Pentium N4200
Grafikkort
Intel HD Graphics 505, 24.20.100.6137
Minne
8192 MB 
, 1200 Hz, LPDDR3
Skärm
10.1 tum 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixlar 224 PPI, 10 punkters kapacitiv, IPS, glansig: nej
Hårddisk
SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1122, 256 GB 
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC298 @ High Definition Audio-Controller
Anslutningar
3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Dockningsstation, Ljudanslutningar: kombinerad 3.5 mm, Kortläsare: MicroSD, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer
Nätverk
Intel I210 Gigabit Network Connection (10MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, Sierra Wireless EM7565, LTE
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 22 x 280.8 x 195.2
Batteri
36 Wh, removeable
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: 2 MPSecondary Camera: 13 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Mono, Tangentbord: Chiclet, 36 Månader Garanti, ruggedized
Vikt
1.3 kg, Strömförsörjning: 342 g

 

Höger: AC-adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, Upp/Ner-knapp, Skärmlås, Strömbrytare, HDMI (exponerad)
Höger: AC-adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, Upp/Ner-knapp, Skärmlås, Strömbrytare, HDMI (exponerad)
Vänster: MicroSD-läsare, USB Typ C + mini-DisplayPort, 2x USB 3.0 Typ A
Vänster: MicroSD-läsare, USB Typ C + mini-DisplayPort, 2x USB 3.0 Typ A
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
142.6 MB/s ∼100% +126%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
136.2 MB/s ∼96% +116%
Xploretech XSLATE L10
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
63.1 MB/s ∼44%
Dell Latitude 3490
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.6 MB/s ∼17% -63%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
239 MB/s ∼100% +168%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
237.5 MB/s ∼99% +167%
Xploretech XSLATE L10
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89.1 MB/s ∼37%
Dell Latitude 3490
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
24.4 MB/s ∼10% -73%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xploretech XSLATE L10
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
664 MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
528 MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
514 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
492 MBit/s ∼74% -26%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
670 MBit/s ∼100% +106%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
661 MBit/s ∼99% +103%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
497 MBit/s ∼74% +53%
Xploretech XSLATE L10
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
325 MBit/s ∼49%
1084.3
cd/m²
1108.5
cd/m²
1164.2
cd/m²
1069.8
cd/m²
1145.9
cd/m²
1129.4
cd/m²
1028.8
cd/m²
1044.5
cd/m²
1034.7
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 1164.2 cd/m² Medel: 1090 cd/m² Minimum: 8.46 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 1145.9 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1014:1 (Svärta: 1.13 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.14 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 5.06
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
67.2% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 42.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
Xploretech XSLATE L10
IPS, 10.1, 1920x1200
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
IPS, 10.5, 2224x1668
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet
Sharp SHP1417 LQ116K1, TN, 11.6, 1366x768
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
Sharp LQ140K1, IPS, 14, 1366x768
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
Semi-Matte Beschichtung, IPS LED, 12, 2160x1440
Dell Latitude 3490
LP140WF6 / LGD059D, IPS LED, 14, 1920x1080
Response Times
-5%
-22%
59%
-16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
32.8 (17.6, 15.2)
39.6 (19.2, 20.4)
-21%
43 (20, 23)
-31%
39 (21, 18)
-19%
36.4 (18.8, 17.6)
-11%
Response Time Black / White *
20 (10.8, 9.2)
17.6 (6, 11.6)
12%
27 (17, 10)
-35%
30 (18, 12)
-50%
24 (13.2, 10.8)
-20%
PWM Frequency
200 (99)
200 (20)
0%
694 (90)
247%
Screen
27%
-37%
-36%
3%
-8%
Brightness middle
1145.9
634
-45%
632
-45%
493
-57%
565
-51%
250
-78%
Brightness
1090
625
-43%
613
-44%
456
-58%
538
-51%
241
-78%
Brightness Distribution
88
87
-1%
90
2%
81
-8%
82
-7%
81
-8%
Black Level *
1.13
0.39
65%
0.47
58%
0.53
53%
0.4
65%
0.25
78%
Contrast
1014
1626
60%
1345
33%
930
-8%
1413
39%
1000
-1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.14
1.9
63%
11.22
-118%
11.08
-116%
5.06
2%
5.5
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
23.66
3.9
84%
15.11
36%
8.1
66%
23.5
1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
5.06
4.8
5%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.4
2.8
36%
12.19
-177%
11.99
-173%
6.4
-45%
3.5
20%
Gamma
2.25 107%
2.26 106%
3.4 71%
4.03 60%
2.25 107%
2.27 106%
CCT
6847 95%
7027 93%
1256 518%
10872 60%
5794 112%
7049 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
42.8
35
-18%
36
-16%
44
3%
37.9
-11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
67.2
54
-20%
56
-17%
70
4%
59.4
-12%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
11% / 21%
-37% / -37%
-29% / -33%
31% / 16%
-12% / -9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.6 ms rise
↘ 15.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8895 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 5490
Intel Core i7-8650U
178 Points ∼86% +279%
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71
Intel Core i7-8550U
168 Points ∼81% +257%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points ∼69% +204%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
Intel Core i5-4200U
96 Points ∼46% +104%
Intel NUC7CJYH
Intel Celeron J4005
77 Points ∼37% +64%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
73 Points ∼35% +55%
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet
Intel Core M-5Y71
62 Points ∼30% +32%
Average Intel Pentium N4200
  (47 - 53, n=12)
51.6 Points ∼25% +10%
Xploretech XSLATE L10
Intel Pentium N4200
47 Points ∼23%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Intel Atom Z3795
38 Points ∼18% -19%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
27 Points ∼13% -43%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS
Intel Core i5-8250U
716 Points ∼24% +419%
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71
Intel Core i7-8550U
655 Points ∼22% +375%
Dell Latitude 5490
Intel Core i7-8650U
651 Points ∼22% +372%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
236 Points ∼8% +71%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
Intel Core i5-4200U
228 Points ∼8% +65%
Average Intel Pentium N4200
  (135 - 175, n=12)
160 Points ∼5% +16%
Intel NUC7CJYH
Intel Celeron J4005
144 Points ∼5% +4%
Xploretech XSLATE L10
Intel Pentium N4200
138 Points ∼5%
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet
Intel Core M-5Y71
124 Points ∼4% -10%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Intel Atom Z3795
118 Points ∼4% -14%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
94 Points ∼3% -32%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 5490
Intel Core i7-8650U
2.04 Points ∼87%
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71
Intel Core i7-8550U
1.94 Points ∼83%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
Intel Core i5-4200U
1.13 Points ∼48%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
0.94 Points ∼40%
Intel NUC7CJYH
Intel Celeron J4005
0.85 Points ∼36%
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet
Intel Core M-5Y71
0.66 Points ∼28%
Average Intel Pentium N4200
  (0.64 - 0.66, n=3)
0.65 Points ∼28%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
0.35 Points ∼15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Latitude 5490
Intel Core i7-8650U
6.97 Points ∼29%
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71
Intel Core i7-8550U
6.11 Points ∼26%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
2.8 Points ∼12%
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
Intel Core i5-4200U
2.48 Points ∼10%
Average Intel Pentium N4200
  (2.02 - 2.27, n=3)
2.13 Points ∼9%
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet
Intel Core M-5Y71
1.57 Points ∼7%
Intel NUC7CJYH
Intel Celeron J4005
1.39 Points ∼6%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
1.17 Points ∼5%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
Intel Core i5-4200U
3712 Points ∼34%
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet
Intel Core M-5Y71
2341 Points ∼22%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
2287 Points ∼21%
Intel NUC7CJYH
Intel Celeron J4005
2085 Points ∼19%
Average Intel Pentium N4200
  (1630 - 1680, n=7)
1657 Points ∼15%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
948 Points ∼9%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Acer Aspire V3-572PG-604M
Intel Core i5-4200U
7614 Points ∼15%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
6610 Points ∼13%
Average Intel Pentium N4200
  (4673 - 5440, n=7)
5092 Points ∼10%
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet
Intel Core M-5Y71
4909 Points ∼10%
Intel NUC7CJYH
Intel Celeron J4005
3500 Points ∼7%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
2911 Points ∼6%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Intel NUC7CJYH
Intel Celeron J4005
1041.79 s * ∼12%
Average Intel Pentium N4200
  (704 - 724, n=2)
714 s * ∼8%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
644.597 s * ∼8%
Dell Latitude 5490
Intel Core i7-8650U
334.6 s * ∼4%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
2252.64 Seconds * ∼10%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
1319.49 Seconds * ∼6%
Intel NUC7CJYH
Intel Celeron J4005
1245.12 Seconds * ∼6%
Dell Latitude 5490
Intel Core i7-8650U
501 Seconds * ∼2%
Average Intel Pentium N4200
  (0.3 - 2636, n=28)
212 Seconds * ∼1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
47 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
138 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
13.09 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Hjälp
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 3490
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix SC311 M.2
4458 Points ∼73% +233%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Liteonit CV3-8D128
3655 Points ∼60% +173%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
3386 Points ∼56% +153%
Intel NUC7CJYH
UHD Graphics 600, J4005, SanDisk Ultra II
2084 Points ∼34% +56%
Xploretech XSLATE L10
HD Graphics 505, N4200, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1122
1337 Points ∼22%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3795, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1139 Points ∼19% -15%
PCMark 10 - Score
Dell Latitude 3490
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix SC311 M.2
3619 Points ∼47% +167%
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
3226 Points ∼42% +138%
Xploretech XSLATE L10
HD Graphics 505, N4200, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1122
1355 Points ∼17%
Intel NUC7CJYH
UHD Graphics 600, J4005, SanDisk Ultra II
1136 Points ∼15% -16%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1337 poäng
Hjälp
Xploretech XSLATE L10
SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1122
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet
Liteon L8H-128V2G M.2 2280
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
Liteonit CV3-8D128
Dell Latitude 3490
SK hynix SC311 M.2
Intel NUC7CJYH
SanDisk Ultra II
AS SSD
-8%
9%
53%
9%
Copy Game MB/s
151.12
158.58
5%
168.56
12%
306.16
103%
175.51
16%
Copy Program MB/s
80.19
101.65
27%
115.45
44%
315.9
294%
102.04
27%
Copy ISO MB/s
275.88
164.77
-40%
302.39
10%
476.73
73%
197.01
-29%
Score Total
1362
643
-53%
762
-44%
1006
-26%
1025
-25%
Score Write
240
164
-32%
226
-6%
387
61%
268
12%
Score Read
746
323
-57%
349
-53%
409
-45%
498
-33%
Access Time Write *
0.119
0.095
20%
0.069
42%
0.052
56%
0.089
25%
Access Time Read *
0.154
0.091
41%
0.121
21%
0.097
37%
0.115
25%
4K-64 Write
170.08
85.79
-50%
124.67
-27%
286.06
68%
174.58
3%
4K-64 Read
682.87
246.63
-64%
267.49
-61%
332.74
-51%
420.47
-38%
4K Write
34.04
64.49
89%
54.73
61%
68.86
102%
47.43
39%
4K Read
16.17
25.41
57%
29.92
85%
27.67
71%
26.98
67%
Seq Write
362.01
139.25
-62%
464.37
28%
318.83
-12%
464.8
28%
Seq Read
465.96
512.79
10%
516.24
11%
484.68
4%
480.03
3%

* ... smaller is better

SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1122
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 554 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 523.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 107.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 72.99 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 434.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 415.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 28.32 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 52.52 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, 8550U
2756 Points ∼16% +471%
Dell Latitude 3490
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1326 Points ∼8% +175%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6300U
1239 Points ∼7% +157%
Intel NUC7CJYH
Intel UHD Graphics 600, J4005
593 Points ∼3% +23%
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet
Intel HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71
569 Points ∼3% +18%
Average Intel HD Graphics 505
  (308 - 751, n=12)
562 Points ∼3% +16%
Xploretech XSLATE L10
Intel HD Graphics 505, N4200
483 Points ∼3%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300
361 Points ∼2% -25%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3795
196 Points ∼1% -59%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, 8550U
2802 Points ∼5% +439%
Dell Latitude 3490
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1634 Points ∼3% +214%
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6300U
1369 Points ∼3% +163%
Average Intel HD Graphics 505
  (473 - 825, n=12)
644 Points ∼1% +24%
Intel NUC7CJYH
Intel UHD Graphics 600, J4005
579 Points ∼1% +11%
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet
Intel HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71
529 Points ∼1% +2%
Xploretech XSLATE L10
Intel HD Graphics 505, N4200
520 Points ∼1%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300
342 Points ∼1% -34%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3795
191 Points ∼0% -63%
3DMark 11 Performance
577 poäng
Hjälp
låg med. hög ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 21.310.2fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
27.8 / 27.8 / 27.8 dB(A)
Hög belastning
27.8 / 29.9 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 27.8 dB(A)
Xploretech XSLATE L10
HD Graphics 505, N4200, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1122
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Liteon L8H-128V2G M.2 2280
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Liteonit CV3-8D128
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
Dell Latitude 3490
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix SC311 M.2
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3795, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Noise
-22%
-9%
-11%
-20%
off / environment *
27.8
30.2
-9%
30.5
-10%
29.8
-7%
Idle Minimum *
27.8
31
-12%
30.2
-9%
30.5
-10%
29.8
-7%
Idle Average *
27.8
31
-12%
30.2
-9%
30.5
-10%
29.8
-7%
Idle Maximum *
27.8
31
-12%
30.2
-9%
30.5
-10%
29.8
-7%
Load Average *
27.8
39.6
-42%
30.2
-9%
31.9
-15%
39.1
-41%
Load Maximum *
29.9
39.9
-33%
31.7
-6%
32.6
-9%
44.3
-48%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 33.6 °C33.2 °C32.4 °C 
 35.4 °C35.6 °C33.8 °C 
 36.8 °C38.8 °C35.2 °C 
Max: 38.8 °C
Medel: 35 °C
33 °C36 °C31.6 °C
40.8 °C39.8 °C39 °C
35.2 °C41.2 °C37.8 °C
Max: 41.2 °C
Medel: 37.2 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  44.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.39 / 1.5 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 3.7 / 10.7 / 11 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 17.8 / 17.9 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xploretech XSLATE L10
N4200, HD Graphics 505, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1122, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion, A10X Fusion GPU, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND , IPS, 2224x1668, 10.5
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet
5Y71, HD Graphics 5300, Liteon L8H-128V2G M.2 2280, TN, 1366x768, 11.6
Panasonic Toughbook CF-XZ6
7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, IPS LED, 2160x1440, 12
Dell Latitude 3490
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 M.2, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14
Apple MacBook 12 2017
7Y32, HD Graphics 615, Apple SSD AP0256, LED IPS, 2304x1440, 12
Power Consumption
48%
8%
11%
-64%
20%
Idle Minimum *
3.7
1.44
61%
3.8
-3%
3.15
15%
3.2
14%
2
46%
Idle Average *
10.7
6.12
43%
9.3
13%
6
44%
5.5
49%
5.4
50%
Idle Maximum *
11
6.14
44%
9.7
12%
6.3
43%
8.1
26%
6.6
40%
Load Average *
17.8
8.55
52%
16.3
8%
21
-18%
40.8
-129%
22
-24%
Load Maximum *
17.9
10.62
41%
15.9
11%
23
-28%
68.1
-280%
20
-12%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
7tim 11min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 36min
Xploretech XSLATE L10
N4200, HD Graphics 505, 36 Wh
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion, A10X Fusion GPU, 30.8 Wh
Dell Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet
5Y71, HD Graphics 5300, 56 Wh
Dell Latitude 3490
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Z3795, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 17.7 Wh
Dell Latitude 14 7414 Rugged Extreme
6300U, HD Graphics 520, 97 Wh
Battery Runtime
45%
9%
61%
-42%
46%
Reader / Idle
2036
WiFi v1.3
431
693
61%
471
9%
694
61%
252
-42%
628
46%
Load
156
199
28%

För

+ rejält med anslutningsalternativ inklusive Smart Card, HDMI, 4G LTE och NFC
+ väldigt ljusstark skärm; utmärkt synlighet utomhus
+ sekundärt löstagbart batteri
+ rejäl och robust design
+ fram och bakåtriktade kameror
+ uppgraderbar M.2 SSD
+ tyst fläktljud

Emot

- dålig basåtergivning; högtalaren kunde låtit högre
- allmänt oexakta färger; begränsad färgrymd
- HDMI är dold bakom opraktiska skruvar
- liten WACOM-stylus, kort fästtråd
- kameran presterar medelmåttigt i situationer med lite ljus
- bakgrundsbelysningen har måttlig till rejäl bleeding
- svag grafikprestanda
- ingen USB Typ C-laddning
- Pentium N4200 är långsam
Recenseras: Xplore Technologies XSLATE L10. Recensionsex från Xplore
Recenseras: Xplore Technologies XSLATE L10. Recensionsex från Xplore

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

L10 fokuserar skarpt på att leverera den bästa upplevelsen för industribruk och träffar till stor del rätt. Färgnoggrannhet, basåtergivning, bleeding hos bakgrundsbelysningen och grafikprestandan är exempel på saker som är dåliga eller som bäst medelmåttiga. Men som tur är kommer dessa nackdelar antagligen inte ha någon stor inverkan på målgruppens vardagliga arbetsuppgifter och kommer troligen inte stå i vägen för ett köp. Istället är det den robusta konstruktionen, anslutbarheten och skärmens ljusstyrka som är viktiga och L10 levererar definitivt på dessa punkter.

Det finns några detaljer som vi hoppas att Xplore kan åtgärda i framtida revideringar. För det första är den propretiära AC-adaptern opraktisk när universell USB Typ C-laddning finns tillgänglig på dom flesta bärbara datorer och surfplattor. För det andra är WACOM-pennan för liten och smal för att kunna hållas på ett bekvämt sätt jämfört med konkurrenternas modeller. För det tredje kunde den maximala ljudnivån ha varit högre för att göra det möjligt att arbeta utomhus eller i industrimiljöer. Vi kan bara hoppas att dom inkonsekventa WiFi-resultaten bara gällde vår enhet och inte är allmänt spridda.

En väldigt ljusstark och mångsidig industrisurfplatta med nästan alla dom funktioner en genomsnittlig konsumentsurfplatta har. Om synlighet utomhus är av yttersta vikt är detta surfplattan att skaffa. Några mindre irritationsmoment innebär att det finns plats för förbättringar i kommande revideringar.

Xploretech XSLATE L10 - 07/15/2018 v6
Allen Ngo

Design
94%
Tangentbord
0 / 80 → 
Mus
89%
Anslutningar
67 / 65 → 100%
Vikt
71 / 40-88 → 65%
Batteri
89%
Skärm
85%
Spelprestanda
41 / 68 → 60%
Programprestanda
45 / 76 → 59%
Temperatur
90%
Ljudnivå
99%
Audio
30 / 91 → 33%
Camera
45 / 85 → 53%
Medel
70%
79%
Tablet - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xplore Technologies XSLATE L10 (Pentium N4200, FHD) Surfplatta (Sammanfattning)
Allen Ngo, 2018-07-24 (Update: 2018-07-24)