Test: Xiaomi Mi 4s smartphone (sammanfattning)

Name: Xiaomi Mi 4s
Brand: Xiaomi

Flaggskepp till lågpris. Mi 4s ger dig ett starkt skäl att bara betala hälften så mycket för en ny smartphone i prestandaklassen. Vi tar reda på hur Xiaomi Mi 4s står sig mot konkurrenterna.

Allen Ngo, Published 04/10/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Touchscreen Smartphone Chinese Tech

Test device courtesy of ibuygou.com

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Mi 4s (Mi Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 6 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53/A57

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 418

Minne

2.7 GB

Skärm

5.00 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar, 10-punkters kapacitiv, IPS, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, 1 Infraröd, Ljudanslutningar: 3,5 mm, Kortläsare: MicroSD, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Fingeravtryck, accelerometer, gyro, närhet, kompass

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1 A2DP, 2G-band: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2, CDMA 800 / 1900, 3G-band: HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 TD-SCDMA, 4G-band: LTE band 1(2100), 3(1800), 7(2600), 38(2600), 39(1900), 40(2300), 41(2500) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.8 x 139.3 x 70.8

Batteri

3210 mAh

Operativsystem

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0, "phase detection autofocus", dual-LED (dual tone)-blixt
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.0, 1080p

Övrigt

Högtalare: Monaural, Wand-Ladegerät, USB-Typ-C-Kabel, Kurzanleitung

Vikt

133 g

Pris

350 USD

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Left: Micro-SIM + Nano-SIM/MicroSD slots


440.2 cd/m²	488.3 cd/m²	471.6 cd/m²
445.2 cd/m²	488.2 cd/m²	482.7 cd/m²
431.5 cd/m²	498.7 cd/m²	490.7 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Max: 498.7 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 470.8 cd/m² Minimum: 0.763 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 488.2 cd/m²
Kontrast: 869:1 (Svärta: 0.562 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.48 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.06 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.4

	Xiaomi Mi 4s 5.00, 1920x1080	Google Nexus 5X 5.20, 1920x1080	Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL 5.00, 1280x720	HTC One A9 5.00, 1920x1080	OnePlus X 5.00, 1920x1080
Response Times
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	36.4 ?(12.8, 23.6)
Response Time Black / White *	21.6 ?(6, 15.6)
PWM Frequency					237 ?(25)
Screen		25%	25%	8%	-63%
Brightness middle	488.2	503 3%	467 -4%	346 -29%	312 -36%
Brightness	471	498 6%	460 -2%	349 -26%	314 -33%
Brightness Distribution	87	97 11%	95 9%	93 7%	91 5%
Black Level *	0.562	0.38 32%	0.3 47%
Contrast	869	1324 52%	1557 79%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.48	2.09 40%	3.28 6%	1.55 55%	6.28 -80%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.01
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.06	2.12 31%	1.89 38%	2.05 33%	8.24 -169%
Gamma	2.4 ^92%	2.27 ^97%	2.21 ^100%	2.15 ^102%	2.12 ^104%
CCT	6627 ^98%	6621 ^98%	6734 ^97%	6267 ^104%	8145 ^80%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		25% / 25%	25% / 25%	8% / 8%	-63% / -63%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12.8 ms rise
36.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Linpack Android / IOS
Multi Thread
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	839 MFLOPS +51%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	819 MFLOPS +47%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	557 MFLOPS
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	275 MFLOPS -51%
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	264.4 MFLOPS -53%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	207.7 MFLOPS -63%
Single Thread
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	630 MFLOPS +49%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	626 MFLOPS +48%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	423.5 MFLOPS
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	134 MFLOPS -68%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	117.1 MFLOPS -72%
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	114.2 MFLOPS -73%

PCMark for Android
Computer Vision score
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1756 Points
Storage score
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3900 Points
Work 2.0 performance score
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3293 Points
Work performance score
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	5050 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4735 Points
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4282 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	3701 Points -22%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3589 Points -24%
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3494 Points -26%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	65936 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	63166 Points
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	36800 Points -42%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	4843 Points
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4154 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	1563 Points
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	1329 Points
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1066 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	528 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	5619 Points +76%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4804 Points +51%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3185 Points
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2824 Points -11%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	2558 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	1561 Points -51%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	1503 Points +20%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1253 Points
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1140 Points -9%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	717 Points -43%
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	623 Points -50%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	526 Points -58%

Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	10540 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	9334 Points +21%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7700 Points
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7650 Points -1%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3917 Points -49%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	3125 Points -59%

Browsermark - 2.1
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2731 points +15%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2368 points
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2111 points -11%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1471 points -38%
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1233 points -48%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	1203 points -49%

Sunspider
1.0 Total Score
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	1573 ms * -144%
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1518 ms * -135%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1235 ms * -91%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	740 ms * -15%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	645 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	347.1 ms * +46%
0.9.1 Total Score
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1396 ms * -128%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	613 ms *

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	49.19 Points +11%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	44.39 Points
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	44.29 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	24.51 Points -45%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	20.83 Points -53%
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	20.13 Points -55%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	13679 ms * -197%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	11843 ms * -157%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	11694 ms * -154%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6585 ms * -43%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4609 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	4037 ms * +12%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	8650 Points +6%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8143 Points
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6955 Points -15%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3764 Points -54%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	3296 Points -60%
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3040 Points -63%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	97 Points
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	80 Points -18%
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	58 Points -40%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	56 Points -42%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	52 Points -46%

Vellamo 3.x
Metal
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2583 Points +16%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2526 Points +14%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2224 Points
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1291 Points -42%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	1219 Points -45%
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1128 Points -49%
Multicore Beta
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	3425 Points +50%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2287 Points
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2272 Points -1%
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1519 Points -34%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1025 Points -55%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	966 Points -58%
Browser
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	5463 Points +17%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4665 Points
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4526 Points -3%
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2753 Points -41%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	2043 (1641^min) Points -56%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1849 Points -60%

Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - ---
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	36419 points +72%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	31148 points +47%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	21167 points
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	20276 points -4%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	17712 points -16%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	15455 points -27%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	15455 points -27%

Smartbench 2012
Gaming Index
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	4498 points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4399 points
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4325 points -2%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	3234 points -26%
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2948 points -33%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	2523 points -43%
Productivity Index
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	13558 points +183%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	10472 points +118%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	4962 points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4793 points
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4194 points -12%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3820 points -20%

PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
3D Graphics Tests
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2345 Points +21%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1935 Points
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1534 Points -21%
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1128 Points -42%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1069 Points -45%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	811 Points -58%
2D Graphics Tests
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5395 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	5274 Points +15%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	4601 Points
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2835 Points -38%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	2745 Points -40%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1818 Points -60%
Memory Tests
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6924 Points +18%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6632 Points +13%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5859 Points
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4838 Points -17%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	3154 Points -46%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	2457 Points -58%
Disk Tests
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	68872 Points +69%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	44133 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	40846 Points
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	35176 Points -14%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	23839 Points -42%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	7518 Points -82%
CPU Tests
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	176225 Points +91%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	126720 Points +38%
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	120120 Points +30%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	92136 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	13288 Points -86%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	10592 Points -89%
System
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	8438 Points +21%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6958 Points
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6462 Points -7%
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4454 Points -36%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3050 Points -56%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	2966 Points -57%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	20.95 MB/s +37%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	15.27 MB/s
OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash	14.22 MB/s -7%
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	12.21 MB/s -20%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.48 MB/s -44%
HTC One A9 Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3.61 MB/s -76%
Random Read 4KB
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	89.9 MB/s +178%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	32.3 MB/s
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	24.8 MB/s -23%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash	20.68 MB/s -36%
OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash	16.31 MB/s -50%
HTC One A9 Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash	10 MB/s -69%
Sequential Write 256KB
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	159.3 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	151.1 MB/s -5%
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	98.6 MB/s -38%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash	90 MB/s -44%
OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.31 MB/s -69%
HTC One A9 Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash	39.61 MB/s -75%
Sequential Read 256KB
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	383 MB/s +55%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	246.8 MB/s
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	245.2 MB/s -1%
OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash	235.5 MB/s -5%
HTC One A9 Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash	187.6 MB/s -24%
Asus Zenfone 2 Deluxe ZE551ML PowerVR G6430, Z3580, 128 GB eMMC Flash	144.5 MB/s -41%

3DMark | Lightmark

3DMark
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	9723 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	9544 Points -2%
HTC One A9 Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash	8761 Points -10%
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6137 Points -37%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	10381 Points
HTC One A9 Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash	4969 Points -52%
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3783 Points -64%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	2135 Points -79%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	10227 Points
HTC One A9 Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash	5498 Points -46%
Bluboo Xtouch Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4136 Points -60%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	2580 Points -75%

Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	14.52 fps +127%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	11.18 fps +75%
Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6.39 fps
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash	0.74 fps -88%

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


43.2 °C	37.2 °C	42.4 °C
42.4 °C	37.2 °C	43.6 °C
38.8 °C	36.4 °C	38.8 °C

Max: 43.6 °C
Medel: 40 °C


32.2 °C	35.2 °C	42.6 °C
32.6 °C	35.2 °C	43 °C
32.2 °C	35.2 °C	36.8 °C

Max: 43 °C
Medel: 36.1 °C

Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.7 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

	Xiaomi Mi 4s Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 64 GB eMMC Flash	Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash	HTC One A9 Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus X Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption		28%	57%	38%	56%
Idle Minimum *	1.4	0.55 61%	0.5 64%	0.9 36%	0.6 57%
Idle Average *	2.15	1.44 33%	0.9 58%	1.2 44%	0.91 58%
Idle Maximum *	2.33	1.9 18%	1.1 53%	1.4 40%	1.12 52%
Load Average *	6.41	3.36 48%	2.4 63%	3.8 41%	3.04 53%
Load Maximum *	8.11	9.76 -20%	4.3 47%	5.9 27%	3.2 61%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Mi 4s 3260 mAh	Google Nexus 5X 2700 mAh	Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL 2070 mAh	HTC One A9 2150 mAh	OnePlus X 2525 mAh
Battery Runtime		22%	-27%	-8%	35%
Reader / Idle	1499	1775 18%		1154 -23%	968 -35%
WiFi v1.3	367	412 12%	267 -27%	368 0%	549 50%
Load	179	245 37%		176 -2%	339 89%

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		24tim 59min
WiFi Websurfing		6tim 07min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		2tim 59min

För

+ högkvalitativ skärm

+ snabb lagring

+ USB Typ-C (2.0-hastigheter)

+ tunn profil

+ batteri med hög kapacitet

+ fingeravtrycksläsare

+ ljusstark skärm

+ bra kamera

+ lättviktig

+ IR-sändare

+ plats för 2 SIM-kort

Emot

- MicroSD-plats delas med extra SIM-plats

- viss strypning under extrem belastning

- haptisk återkoppling kunde varit kraftigare

- bakbelysningen kunde varit jämnare

- fast batteri

- mycket varm under belastning

- medelmåttig batteritid

- ej NFC eller MHL

- halt grepp

In review: Xiaomi Mi 4s. Test model provided by iBuyGou.com

En längre version av testet kan läsas på engelska här.

Det är svårt att hitta några större brister med Mi 4s. Prestandan är i övre segmentet bland mellanklasslurarna och designen ger ett intryck som är lyxigare än vad priset indikerar. Bildkvaliteten är utmärkt och bakgrundsbelysningen stark, medan fingeravtrycksläsaren, den dubbla SIM-kapaciteten, MicroSD-läsaren, och mobilens låga vikt kan läggas till listan över fördelar. Mi 4s känns mycket balanserad och ingen egenskap faller under förväntningarna.

Istället har Mi 4s en hel del mindre nackdelar som skiljer den från telefoner för nästan dubbla priset. Skärmens bakgrundsbelysning är lite ojämn och vår testmodell hade ett litet men märkbart glapp mellan kanterna på höljet. Extra funktioner som NFC och trådlös laddning saknas och USB Typ-C porten är begränsad till USB 2.0-specifikationerna. Batteriets livslängd och yttemperaturerna lämnar också utrymme för förbättringar.

I samma prisklass ställs Mi 4s direkt mot Nexus 5X. Den senare har en något större och mer ljusstark skärm, längre batteritid, lägre temperaturer, NFC och en orörd Androidupplevelse, vilket i samtliga fall är giltiga skäl att välja Googletelefonen istället för Xiaomi. Om designen och MicroSD-platsen är viktig får däremot Xiaomi Mi 4s ett litet försprång.

Xiaomi Mi 4s - 2016-04-21 04/21/2016 v5.1^(old)
Allen Ngo

Design

79%

Tangentbord

84 / 75 → 100%

Mus

89%

Anslutningar

33 / 60 → 55%

Vikt

94%

Batteri

88%

Skärm

85%

Spelprestanda

25 / 63 → 40%

Programprestanda

48 / 70 → 68%

Temperatur

89%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

40 / 91 → 44%

Camera

56%

Medel

70%

82%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5192 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Mi 4s smartphone (sammanfattning)

Allen Ngo, 2016-04-10 (Update: 2017-05-23)