Notebookcheck

Test: Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) (sammanfattning)

Florian Wimmer, 06/06/2016

Igår plast, idag metall. Den nya versionen av Galaxy J5 vill göra ett bättre kvalitetsintryck, men innanmätet är i stort sett oförändrat. Är det ändå en lyckad uppdatering?

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 (Galaxy J Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 306
Minne
2048 MB 
Skärm
5.2 tum 16:9, 1280x720 pixlar 282 PPI, kapacitiv pekskärm, AMOLED, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 12.3 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3,5 mm Headset, Kortläsare: micro-SD max. 128GB, NFC, Sensorer: rörelsesensor, närhetssensor, lägessensor, USB OTG
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1800/2100), LTE (1,3,5,7,8,20); max: 150 MBit/s (nedströms), 50 MBit/s (uppströms); 0.45 W/kg (huvud), 1.17 W/kg (kropp), LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.1 x 145.8 x 72.3
Batteri
11.94 Wh, 3100 mAh Litiumjon, removeable
Operativsystem
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/1.9, AF, LED-blixt, video @1080p/30FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/1.9, LED-blixt
Övrigt
Högtalare: högtalare bak, Tangentbord: virtuellt, headset, S-Planner, Microsoft Office, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless
Vikt
159 g, Strömförsörjning: 48 g
Pris
279 Kr

 

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a loyal reader of notebookcheck? Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Especially wanted: 
English-Swedish-Translator - 
Details here
News Editor - Details here

Review Editor - 
Details here

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GPS Samsung Galaxy J5: Overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy J5: Overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy J5: Crossing
GPS Samsung Galaxy J5: Crossing
GPS Samsung Galaxy J5: Riverside
GPS Samsung Galaxy J5: Riverside
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Riverside
GPS Garmin Edge 500: Riverside

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
293
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
288
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 299 cd/m² Medel: 291.2 cd/m² Minimum: 4.01 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 289 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.03
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
LG K10
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Acer Liquid Z630S
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Honor 5X
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J5
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Screen
31%
-47%
-20%
-2%
-6%
Brightness
291
380
31%
355
22%
345
19%
521
79%
353
21%
Brightness Distribution
96
91
-5%
92
-4%
84
-12%
85
-11%
93
-3%
Black Level *
0.28
0.27
0.43
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.7
1.95
59%
6.7
-43%
4.7
-0%
4.88
-4%
5.22
-11%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3
1.86
38%
7.9
-163%
5.6
-87%
5.2
-73%
3.96
-32%
Gamma
2.03 118%
2.13 113%
2.21 109%
1.84 130%
2.26 106%
2.08 115%
CCT
6291 103%
6376 102%
9072 72%
6795 96%
7766 84%
7308 89%
Contrast
1321
1296
1244

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 243.9 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 243.9 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 243.9 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6668 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
27232 Points ∼12%
LG K10
27383 Points ∼12% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
41676 Points ∼18% +53%
Acer Liquid Z630S
35585 Points ∼16% +31%
Honor 5X
37152 Points ∼16% +36%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1425 Points ∼4%
LG K10
1448 Points ∼4% +2%
Honor 5X
3047 Points ∼8% +114%
Samsung Galaxy J5
1403 Points ∼4% -2%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
473 Points ∼10%
LG K10
476 Points ∼10% +1%
Honor 5X
698 Points ∼15% +48%
Samsung Galaxy J5
464 Points ∼10% -2%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
709 Points ∼24%
LG K10
730 Points ∼24% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
1479 Points ∼49% +109%
Acer Liquid Z630S
1113 Points ∼37% +57%
Honor 5X
1089 Points ∼36% +54%
Samsung Galaxy J5
734 Points ∼24% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
42 Points ∼1%
LG K10
41 Points ∼1% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
275 Points ∼4% +555%
Acer Liquid Z630S
229 Points ∼3% +445%
Honor 5X
103 Points ∼1% +145%
Samsung Galaxy J5
42 Points ∼1% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
53 Points ∼1%
LG K10
52 Points ∼1% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
336 Points ∼7% +534%
Acer Liquid Z630S
278 Points ∼6% +425%
Honor 5X
129 Points ∼3% +143%
Samsung Galaxy J5
53 Points ∼1% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9022 Points ∼13%
LG K10
9106 Points ∼13% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
9495 Points ∼13% +5%
Acer Liquid Z630S
10508 Points ∼15% +16%
Honor 5X
8174 Points ∼11% -9%
Samsung Galaxy J5
9079 Points ∼13% +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3838 Points ∼1%
LG K10
3774 Points ∼1% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7542 Points ∼2% +97%
Acer Liquid Z630S
6250 Points ∼1% +63%
Honor 5X
7764 Points ∼2% +102%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3782 Points ∼1% -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4400 Points ∼2%
LG K10
4339 Points ∼2% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
7903 Points ∼4% +80%
Acer Liquid Z630S
6868 Points ∼3% +56%
Honor 5X
7852 Points ∼4% +78%
Samsung Galaxy J5
4345 Points ∼2% -1%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
5.2 fps ∼0%
LG K10
5.2 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps ∼1% +169%
Acer Liquid Z630S
12 fps ∼1% +131%
Honor 5X
14 fps ∼1% +169%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
9.7 fps ∼2%
LG K10
9.7 fps ∼2% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
14 fps ∼3% +44%
Acer Liquid Z630S
21 fps ∼5% +116%
Honor 5X
14 fps ∼3% +44%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1.8 fps ∼0%
LG K10
1.8 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps ∼1% +111%
Acer Liquid Z630S
4.2 fps ∼1% +133%
Honor 5X
5.4 fps ∼1% +200%
Samsung Galaxy J5
1.8 fps ∼0% 0%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
3.8 fps ∼1%
LG K10
4.1 fps ∼1% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3.8 fps ∼1% 0%
Acer Liquid Z630S
9 fps ∼2% +137%
Honor 5X
5.9 fps ∼2% +55%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3.8 fps ∼1% 0%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
4126 Points ∼50%
LG K10
3999 Points ∼48% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
4008 Points ∼48% -3%
Acer Liquid Z630S
3814 Points ∼46% -8%
Honor 5X
3794 Points ∼46% -8%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3966 Points ∼48% -4%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
551 Points ∼36%
LG K10
562 Points ∼36% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
741 Points ∼48% +34%
Acer Liquid Z630S
627 Points ∼41% +14%
Honor 5X
9 Points ∼1% -98%
Samsung Galaxy J5
615 Points ∼40% +12%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
312 Points ∼4%
LG K10
310 Points ∼4% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
488 Points ∼6% +56%
Acer Liquid Z630S
416 Points ∼5% +33%
Honor 5X
763 Points ∼9% +145%
Samsung Galaxy J5
314 Points ∼4% +1%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
643 Points ∼15%
LG K10
453 Points ∼10% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
554 Points ∼13% -14%
Acer Liquid Z630S
540 Points ∼12% -16%
Honor 5X
787 Points ∼18% +22%
Samsung Galaxy J5
399 Points ∼9% -38%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
1060 Points ∼16%
LG K10
1050 Points ∼16% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
2153 Points ∼33% +103%
Acer Liquid Z630S
1614 Points ∼25% +52%
Honor 5X
1378 Points ∼21% +30%
Samsung Galaxy J5
1058 Points ∼16% 0%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
585 Points ∼15%
LG K10
536 Points ∼14% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
810 Points ∼21% +38%
Acer Liquid Z630S
691 Points ∼18% +18%
Honor 5X
297 Points ∼8% -49%
Samsung Galaxy J5
534 Points ∼14% -9%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Z630S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
2730 Points ∼6%
LG K10
2838 Points ∼6% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
3611 Points ∼7% +32%
Acer Liquid Z630S
2855 Points ∼6% +5%
Honor 5X
3595 Points ∼7% +32%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3038 Points ∼6% +11%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
13046 ms * ∼22%
LG K10
16638 ms * ∼28% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
11887 ms * ∼20% +9%
Acer Liquid Z630S
12876 ms * ∼22% +1%
Honor 5X
12510 ms * ∼21% +4%
Samsung Galaxy J5
14074 ms * ∼24% -8%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
47 Points ∼6%
LG K10
47 Points ∼6% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
64 Points ∼9% +36%
Honor 5X
65 Points ∼9% +38%
Samsung Galaxy J5
52 Points ∼7% +11%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
16.8 Points ∼5%
LG K10
17.478 Points ∼5% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
22 Points ∼7% +31%
Acer Liquid Z630S
19.028 Points ∼6% +13%
Honor 5X
21.92 Points ∼7% +30%
Samsung Galaxy J5
18.424 Points ∼6% +10%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
46.61 MB/s ∼53%
LG K10
45 MB/s ∼52% -3%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
79.83 MB/s ∼83%
LG K10
75.47 MB/s ∼78% -5%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
11.6 MB/s ∼8%
LG K10
7.5 MB/s ∼5% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
11.2 MB/s ∼7% -3%
Acer Liquid Z630S
5.82 MB/s ∼4% -50%
Honor 5X
10 MB/s ∼7% -14%
Samsung Galaxy J5
7.2 MB/s ∼5% -38%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
21 MB/s ∼12%
LG K10
9.2 MB/s ∼5% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
22.9 MB/s ∼13% +9%
Acer Liquid Z630S
28.43 MB/s ∼16% +35%
Honor 5X
17 MB/s ∼10% -19%
Samsung Galaxy J5
19.25 MB/s ∼11% -8%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
72 MB/s ∼35%
LG K10
78 MB/s ∼38% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
60.4 MB/s ∼29% -16%
Acer Liquid Z630S
67.7 MB/s ∼33% -6%
Honor 5X
78 MB/s ∼38% +8%
Samsung Galaxy J5
39.4 MB/s ∼19% -45%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
147 MB/s ∼18%
LG K10
131 MB/s ∼16% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
209.4 MB/s ∼26% +42%
Acer Liquid Z630S
249.01 MB/s ∼31% +69%
Honor 5X
144 MB/s ∼18% -2%
Samsung Galaxy J5
145.47 MB/s ∼18% -1%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InställningarVärde
 high16 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 InställningarVärde
 high30 fps
Hög belastning
 34.3 °C34 °C33.7 °C 
 36.4 °C36.1 °C34.4 °C 
 36.9 °C37 °C34.7 °C 
Max: 37 °C
Medel: 35.3 °C
34.9 °C34.6 °C34.6 °C
35.5 °C36.7 °C37.9 °C
36 °C38.2 °C38.5 °C
Max: 38.5 °C
Medel: 36.3 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  32.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.12 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.61 / 1.41 / 1.51 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 2.56 / 3.1 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
26tim 39min
Surfa med WLAN v1.3
10tim 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10tim 58min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
6tim 42min
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Acer Liquid Z630S
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Honor 5X
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
LG K10
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J5
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime
6%
-27%
16%
-28%
-14%
Reader / Idle
1599
1053
-34%
2323
45%
1123
-30%
1292
-19%
H.264
658
602
-9%
672
2%
603
-8%
657
0%
WiFi v1.3
643
681
6%
643
0%
626
-3%
453
-30%
495
-23%
Load
402
144
-64%
483
20%
231
-43%
350
-13%

För

+ AMOLED-skärm med hög kontrast
+ metallram
+ bra mottagning
+ LED-blixt fram
+ relativt snabb lagring
+ mycket bra batteritid

Emot

- relativt tung
- långsam Wi-Fi
- dålig röstkvalitet
- oskarpa, bleka foton
- medelmåttig ljudkvalitet
- ingen ljussensor
- högfrekvent skärmflimmer
In review: Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)
In review: Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)

Läs en längre version av testet på engelska här.

Svaret på frågan om uppdateringen av Samsungs Galaxy J5 har varit framgångsrik är ja. Metallhöljet ger ett mycket högre kvalitetsintryck och ser mer modernt ut än föregångarens plasthölje. 

Kameran på framsidan har uppgraderats med en fullfjädrad LED-blixt. Arbetsminnet och lagringskapaciteten har ökats, processorn är något snabbare och du får nu mer skärmyta till ditt förfogande. Gamla meriter som AMOLED-panelen och det utbytbara batteriet har behållits. Dessutom är batteritiden nu mycket bättre.

Galaxy J5 2016 är inte perfekt, men är en riktigt bra smartphone i den lägre mellanklassen. Tack vare den långa batteritiden, AMOLED-panelen och ett fräscht operativsystem bör alla som är på jakt efter en ny och prisvärd smartphone ha luren i åtanke.

Några detaljer kan dock kritiseras: Överföringshastigheterna via Wi-Fi var ovanligt låga, enheten är jämförelsevis tung och röstkvaliteten är inte imponerande. Högtalaren är inte heller imponerande och kamerans bilder ser ganska mörka och bleka ut.

Kan man leva med ovanstående nackdelar kan det inte bli fel med Samsungs Galaxy J5 årgång 2016. Det kan t.o.m. vara värt att uppgradera för ägare av föregångaren.

Samsung Galaxy J5 2016 - 05/11/2016 v5.1
Florian Wimmer

Design
90%
Tangentbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Mus
91%
Anslutningar
38 / 60 → 64%
Vikt
92%
Batteri
93%
Skärm
85%
Spelprestanda
5 / 63 → 8%
Programprestanda
33 / 70 → 47%
Temperatur
91%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
48 / 91 → 52%
Camera
67%
Medel
69%
82%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) (sammanfattning)
Florian Wimmer, 2016-06- 6 (Update: 2016-11-23)