Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Honor 5X smartphone (sammanfattning)

Mer metall. Huaweis serie Honor brukar innehålla prisvärda enheter. Här testar vi Honor 5X med metallhölje och avancerade kameror för att ta reda på om helheten är övertygande.
Honor 5X (5 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 8 x 1.7 GHz, Cortex-A53
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 405
Minne
2048 MB 
Skärm
5.50 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar, kapacitiv pekskärm, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9.67 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: headset, Kortläsare: micro-SD max. 128 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: rörelsesensor, närhetssensor, ljussensor, kompass, fingeravtrycksläsare
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B7/B8/B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.2 x 151.3 x 76.3
Batteri
11 Wh, 3000 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix AF, LED-blixt, video @1080p/30FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Högtalare nedtill, Tangentbord: virtuellt, laddare, HonorClub, HiCare, phone manager, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless
Vikt
158 g, Strömförsörjning: 51 g
Pris
229 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

151.3 mm 76.3 mm 8.2 mm 158 g144 mm 71.5 mm 10.5 mm 140 g142.1 mm 72.4 mm 11.6 mm 155 g142.1 mm 71.8 mm 7.9 mm 147 g140 mm 69 mm 6.9 mm 138 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
475
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
538
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
535
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
509
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
559
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 559 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 521.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5.84 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 535 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1244:1 (Svärta: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.88 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.26
Honor 5X
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus X
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J5
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Screen
-32%
20%
-4%
-8%
Brightness middle
535
312
-42%
467
-13%
418
-22%
349
-35%
Brightness
521
314
-40%
460
-12%
407
-22%
353
-32%
Brightness Distribution
85
91
7%
95
12%
95
12%
93
9%
Black Level *
0.43
0.3
30%
0.49
-14%
Contrast
1244
1557
25%
853
-31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.88
6.28
-29%
3.28
33%
3.92
20%
5.22
-7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.66
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.2
8.24
-58%
1.89
64%
3.81
27%
3.96
24%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.12 104%
2.21 100%
2.27 97%
2.08 106%
CCT
7766 84%
8145 80%
6734 97%
7361 88%
7308 89%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X
698 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
464 Points -34%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
526 Points -25%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X
3047 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
1403 Points -54%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1561 Points -49%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X
37152 Points
OnePlus X
52463 Points +41%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 5X
5.9 fps
OnePlus X
10 fps +69%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3.8 fps -36%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
3.8 fps -36%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3.7 fps -37%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 5X
5.4 fps
OnePlus X
8.6 fps +59%
Samsung Galaxy J5
1.8 fps -67%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
1.8 fps -67%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1.7 fps -69%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 5X
14 fps
OnePlus X
23 fps +64%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
9.2 fps -34%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
9.5 fps -32%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 5X
14 fps
OnePlus X
21 fps +50%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
5.2 fps -63%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
5.3 fps -62%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 5X
129 Points
OnePlus X
710 Points +450%
Samsung Galaxy J5
53 Points -59%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
52 Points -60%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
49 Points -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5X
103 Points
OnePlus X
643 Points +524%
Samsung Galaxy J5
42 Points -59%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
41 Points -60%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
39 Points -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5X
1089 Points
OnePlus X
1117 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy J5
734 Points -33%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
733 Points -33%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
758 Points -30%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X
9609 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
5227 Points -46%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
5298 Points -45%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5X
10045 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
4692 Points -53%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
4712 Points -53%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5X
8343 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
8697 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
9385 Points +12%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X
5551 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
2631 Points -53%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
2580 Points -54%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5X
5056 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
2193 Points -57%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
2135 Points -58%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5X
8445 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5
8732 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
9544 Points +13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X
7852 Points
OnePlus X
15051 Points +92%
Samsung Galaxy J5
4345 Points -45%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
4402 Points -44%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X
7764 Points
OnePlus X
14541 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3782 Points -51%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3789 Points -51%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 5X
8174 Points
OnePlus X
17156 Points +110%
Samsung Galaxy J5
9079 Points +11%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
10148 Points +24%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 5X
297 Points
OnePlus X
1252 Points +322%
Samsung Galaxy J5
534 Points +80%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
646 Points +118%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
515 Points +73%
System (sort by value)
Honor 5X
1378 Points
OnePlus X
2225 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy J5
1058 Points -23%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
1077 Points -22%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1166 Points -15%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 5X
787 Points
OnePlus X
662 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy J5
399 Points -49%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
797 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
394 Points -50%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 5X
763 Points
OnePlus X
1975 Points +159%
Samsung Galaxy J5
314 Points -59%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
316 Points -59%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
315 Points -59%
Web (sort by value)
Honor 5X
9 Points
OnePlus X
843 Points +9267%
Samsung Galaxy J5
615 Points +6733%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
643 Points +7044%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
484 Points +5278%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 5X
3794 Points
OnePlus X
4450 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3966 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3701 Points -2%
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Honor 5X
144 MB/s
OnePlus X
235.5 MB/s +64%
Samsung Galaxy J5
145.5 MB/s +1%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
131.4 MB/s -9%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Honor 5X
78 MB/s
OnePlus X
49.31 MB/s -37%
Samsung Galaxy J5
39.4 MB/s -49%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
22.33 MB/s -71%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Honor 5X
17 MB/s
OnePlus X
16.31 MB/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy J5
19.25 MB/s +13%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
22.79 MB/s +34%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Honor 5X
10 MB/s
OnePlus X
14.22 MB/s +42%
Samsung Galaxy J5
7.2 MB/s -28%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
5.11 MB/s -49%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Honor 5X
12510 ms *
OnePlus X
7264 ms * +42%
Samsung Galaxy J5
14074 ms * -13%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
14680 ms * -17%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
11843 ms * +5%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X
3595 Points
OnePlus X
4810 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy J5
3038 Points -15%
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
3012 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3296 Points -8%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 5X
21.92 Points
OnePlus X
28 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy J5
18.42 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
20.83 Points -5%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Honor 5X
65 Points
OnePlus X
85 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy J5
52 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
52 Points -20%

Legend

 
Honor 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InställningarVärde
 high21 fps
 very low35 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 InställningarVärde
 high32 fps
Hög belastning
 41.2 °C38.4 °C38.4 °C 
 41.6 °C38.1 °C35.8 °C 
 39.7 °C37.3 °C37.5 °C 
Max: 41.6 °C
Medel: 38.7 °C
35.6 °C37.3 °C37.5 °C
35.6 °C37.1 °C37 °C
35.3 °C36.9 °C36.3 °C
Max: 37.5 °C
Medel: 36.5 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  35.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 22.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.13 / 0.3 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.87 / 2.08 / 2.22 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 5.26 / 6.34 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
17tim 33min
WiFi Websurfing
10tim 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10tim 02min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
2tim 24min
Honor 5X
Adreno 405, 616 MSM8939v2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus X
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J5
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Asus Zenfone 2 ZE500KL
Adreno 306, 410 APQ8016, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime
24%
38%
27%
-58%
Reader / Idle
1053
968
-8%
1292
23%
1364
30%
H.264
602
514
-15%
657
9%
677
12%
WiFi v1.3
643
549
-15%
495
-23%
526
-18%
267
-58%
Load
144
339
135%
350
143%
264
83%

För

+ högkvalitativt metallhölje
+ bra pris/prestanda-ratio
+ övertygande batteritid i Wi-Fi-testet
+ ljusstark skärm
+ stilren och bra mjukvara
+ skapliga kameror
+ fingeravtrycksläsare med extrafunktioner

Emot

- medelmåttig GPS-mottagning
- dålig samtalskvalitet
- högtalarens låga kvalitet
- kort batteritid under belastning
In review: Honor 5X. Test model courtesy of Honor Germany.
In review: Honor 5X. Test model courtesy of Honor Germany.

Läs en längre version av testet här (på engelska).

Huawei har satt ihop ett tilltalande paket med en högpresterande enhet insvept i ett elegant hölje, till ett bra pris dessutom. Mjukvaran är snygg och praktisk, kamerorna tar ordentliga bilder och 24 månaders garanti ingår.

Honor 5X är ett fynd om man kan leva med vissa brister: medioker samtalskvalitet, medelmåttig högtalare och instabil GPS-mottagning. Men det attraktiva höljet och den ljusstarka skärmen kompenserar för mycket.

En annan svaghet för Honor 5X är batteritiden under belastning, vilket gör oss lite osäkra. Å ena sidan är många saker bra och priset lågt. Å andra sidan kan man få ännu högre prestanda för en liten slant till, eller välja en modell från förra året som inte har samma brister som Honor 5X.

Prismedvetna köpare bör titta närmare på Honor 5X eftersom många av dess funktioner är unika i prisklassen (skärmstorlek, prestanda, metallhölje). Är man villiga att spendera lite mer är däremot alternativen många.

Honor 5X - 03/07/2016 v5(old)
Florian Wimmer

Design
83%
Tangentbord
70 / 75 → 93%
Mus
93%
Anslutningar
42 / 60 → 70%
Vikt
92%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
86%
Spelprestanda
13 / 63 → 20%
Programprestanda
30 / 70 → 43%
Temperatur
87%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
53 / 91 → 58%
Camera
75%
Medel
70%
84%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Honor 5X smartphone (sammanfattning)
Florian Wimmer, 2016-04- 9 (Update: 2016-11-23)