Test: Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF (i7-8550U, GeForce MX130) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Name: Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71
Brand: Asus

Billigt pris, billigt chassi. Det finns inget med den här VivoBook-modellen som får den att stå ut från mängden av multimediamodeller på 15 tum. När man betänker målgruppen och det låga priset behöver det tråkiga intrycket inte vara ett problem. Vi hoppas att framtida översyner åtgärdar det dåliga tangentbordet och lägger till laddning via USB Typ C.

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 06/18/2018 🇺🇸 🇳🇱 ...

Laptop / Notebook Ultrabook Kaby Lake

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 (Vivobook 15 F Serie)

Processor

Intel Core i7-8550U 4 x 1.8 - 4 GHz, Kaby Lake Refresh

Grafikkort

NVIDIA GeForce MX130 - 2048 MB VRAM, Kärna: 1108 MHz, Minne: 5010 MHz, GDDR5, 388.57, Optimus

Minne

8 GB

, DDR4-2400, PC4-19200, 1200 MHz, 10-10-10-28, Enkel-kanal

Skärm

15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WF9-SPK2, IPS, LGD073, glansig: nej

Moderkort

Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH

Hårddisk

Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, 1024 GB

Ljudkort

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Anslutningar

2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Ljudanslutningar: kombinerad 3.5 mm, Kortläsare: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor

Nätverk

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 19.4 x 361 x 244

Batteri

42 Wh, 3 celler

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webbkamera: VGA

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: nej, Asus Hello, Giftbox, E-Service, 12 Månader Garanti

Vikt

1.624 kg, Strömförsörjning: 212 g

Pris

750 USD

Länkar

Asus hemsida
Asus kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R4W1 Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	80.1 MB/s +160%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	69.4 MB/s +125%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R4W1	32.4 MB/s +5%
Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	30.9 MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	30.8 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	88.1 MB/s +149%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	82 MB/s +132%
Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	37.5 MB/s +6%
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	35.39 MB/s
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R4W1	35 MB/s -1%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	676 MBit/s +35%
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	500 MBit/s
Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	339 MBit/s -32%
Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	325 MBit/s -35%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	48 MBit/s -90%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	647 MBit/s
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter	632 MBit/s -2%
Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	337 MBit/s -48%
Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	331 MBit/s -49%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	174 MBit/s -73%


237.2 cd/m²	261.8 cd/m²	237.8 cd/m²
249.9 cd/m²	257 cd/m²	238 cd/m²
243.7 cd/m²	255.4 cd/m²	233.2 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

LG Philips LP156WF9-SPK2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 261.8 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 246 cd/m² Minimum: 13.66 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 257 cd/m²
Kontrast: 756:1 (Svärta: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.54 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 3.61
ΔE Greyscale 4.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
59.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.35% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 LG Philips LP156WF9-SPK2, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T AU Optronics B156W02 / AUO B156HAN02.1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 Innolux JMC9X 156BGA, TN LED, 15.60, 1366x768	HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Chi Mei CM15E9, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB LG Philips LGD0573 LP156WF9-SPK2, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R4W1 BOE CQ NV156FHM-N48, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Display		-1%	2%	5%	-2%	0%
Display P3 Coverage	39.35	38.94 -1%	40.02 2%	41.36 5%	38.62 -2%	39.59 1%
sRGB Coverage	59.2	58.5 -1%	59.8 1%	62.2 5%	58.1 -2%	58.5 -1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	40.65	40.23 -1%	41.37 2%	42.74 5%	39.91 -2%	40.9 1%
Response Times		-43%	-41%	-26%	-30%	-57%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	27.2 ?(13.2, 14)	47 ?(21, 26) -73%	50 ?(28, 22) -84%	40 ?(22, 18) -47%	42 ?(22, 20) -54%	46 ?(25, 21) -69%
Response Time Black / White *	24.8 ?(14, 10.8)	28 ?(16, 12) -13%	24 ?(20, 4) 3%	26 ?(14, 12) -5%	26 ?(15, 11) -5%	36 ?(20, 16) -45%
PWM Frequency			250 ?(20)	25000 ?(30)		21000 ?(90)
Screen		22%	-39%	29%	9%	15%
Brightness middle	257	293 14%	197 -23%	221 -14%	270 5%	237 -8%
Brightness	246	275 12%	195 -21%	207 -16%	250 2%	229 -7%
Brightness Distribution	89	86 -3%	78 -12%	87 -2%	87 -2%	88 -1%
Black Level *	0.34	0.25 26%	0.43 -26%	0.15 56%	0.25 26%	0.19 44%
Contrast	756	1172 55%	458 -39%	1473 95%	1080 43%	1247 65%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.54	3.81 16%	10.35 -128%	4.35 4%	4.79 -6%	4.85 -7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	16	6.64 58%	16.02 -0%	8.98 44%	8.83 45%	8.34 48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	3.61
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.6	2.66 42%	11.25 -145%	3.09 33%	5.66 -23%	3.84 17%
Gamma	2.44 ^90%	2.54 ^87%	2.08 ^106%	2.23 ^99%	2.64 ^83%	2.42 ^91%
CCT	7096 ^92%	6541 ^99%	11592 ^56%	6068 ^107%	7179 ^91%	6790 ^96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	37.5	37 -1%	38 1%	56 49%	37 -1%	37 -1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	59.2	58 -2%	60 1%	86 45%	59 0%	58 -2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-7% / 9%	-26% / -31%	3% / 17%	-8% / 2%	-14% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13.2 ms rise
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 Intel Core i7-8550U	168 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8550U (108 - 172, n=76)	159.6 Points -5%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G Intel Core i5-8305G	157 Points -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25 Intel Core i7-7500U	146 Points -13%
Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T Intel Core i5-8250U	146 Points -13%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	142 Points -15%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 AMD Ryzen 7 2700U	141 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 Intel Core i5-7300HQ	138 Points -18%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T Intel Core i5-7200U	130 Points -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points -23%
Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 AMD Ryzen 3 2200U	107 Points -36%
Asus VivoBook 17 X705UA-BX022T Intel Core i3-7100U	100 Points -40%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T Intel Core i5-8250U	730 Points +11%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G Intel Core i5-8305G	710 Points +8%
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 Intel Core i7-8550U	655 Points
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	618 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U (301 - 761, n=78)	576 Points -12%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 AMD Ryzen 7 2700U	566 Points -14%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 Intel Core i5-7300HQ	516 Points -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25 Intel Core i7-7500U	367 Points -44%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points -49%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points -49%
Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 AMD Ryzen 3 2200U	306 Points -53%
Asus VivoBook 17 X705UA-BX022T Intel Core i3-7100U	256 Points -61%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 Intel Core i7-8550U	1.94 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8550U (1.43 - 1.95, n=32)	1.834 Points -5%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G Intel Core i5-8305G	1.79 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25 Intel Core i7-7500U	1.61 Points -17%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	1.61 Points -17%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 AMD Ryzen 7 2700U	1.58 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 Intel Core i5-7300HQ	1.56 Points -20%
Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 AMD Ryzen 3 2200U	0.85 Points -56%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G Intel Core i5-8305G	7.47 Points +22%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	6.91 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U (4.38 - 8.56, n=32)	6.28 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 Intel Core i7-8550U	6.11 Points
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 Intel Core i5-7300HQ	5.93 Points -3%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 AMD Ryzen 7 2700U	5.88 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25 Intel Core i7-7500U	3.4 Points -44%
Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 AMD Ryzen 3 2200U	2.68 Points -56%

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.94 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

6.11 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

69.2 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

168 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

655 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

82 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Hjälp

... jämför

PCMark 8 | PCMark 10

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4464 Points +21%
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 GeForce MX130, i5-8550U, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	3704 Points
Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	3695 Points 0%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8	3468 Points -6%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3462 Points -7%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R4W1 Vega 8, R5 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	3450 Points -7%
Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 Vega 3, R3 2200U, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	3185 Points -14%

PCMark 10 - Score
Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	3418 Points +22%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	2944 Points +5%
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 GeForce MX130, i5-8550U, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	2801 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 Vega 3, R3 2200U, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	2534 Points -10%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R4W1 Vega 8, R5 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	2501 Points -11%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3704 poäng
PCMark 10 Score		2801 poäng
Hjälp

	Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R4W1 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	Asus FX504GD Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172	Average Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		37%	5966%	6335%	-25%	-17%
Write 4K	1.283	3.776 194%	94.9 7297%	98.7 7593%	0.27 -79%	1.254 ?(0.217 - 3.78, n=7) -2%
Read 4K	0.493	0.439 -11%	27.3 5438%	29.07 5797%	0.586 19%	0.3733 ?(0.285 - 0.493, n=7) -24%
Write Seq	79.3	74.9 -6%	410.4 418%	606 664%	86.8 9%	84 ?(71.1 - 102.3, n=7) 6%
Read Seq	136.7	136.3 0%	464 239%	1118 718%	113.2 -17%	108.7 ?(85.3 - 136.7, n=7) -20%
Write 4K Q32T1	2.266	4.585 102%	246.5 10778%	175.2 7632%	0.242 -89%	1.574 ?(0.222 - 4.59, n=7) -31%
Read 4K Q32T1	1.068	1.135 6%	246.4 22971%	287.8 26848%	0.963 -10%	0.87 ?(0.647 - 1.135, n=7) -19%
Write Seq Q32T1	108.7	114.5 5%	451.4 315%	599 451%	98.4 -9%	91.1 ?(56.5 - 114.5, n=7) -16%
Read Seq Q32T1	143.7	146 2%	532 270%	1551 979%	110.2 -23%	104.4 ?(78.6 - 146, n=7) -27%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035

Överföringshastighet min.: 40.5 MB/s

Överföringshastighet max.: 126 MB/s

Överföringshastighet med.: 87.7 MB/s

Accesstid: 19.6 ms

Burst rate: 164.1 MB/s

CPU-användning: 5.5 %

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ	15322 Points +447%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i5-8305G	9862 Points +252%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7200U	8329 Points +197%
Asus FX504GD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H	7133 Points +155%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8550U	3551 Points +27%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 2500U	3549 Points +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (2476 - 3203, n=14)	2872 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	2849 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8550U	2802 Points
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U	2689 Points -4%
HP ProBook 470 G5 NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, i5-8250U	2376 Points -15%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	1420 Points -49%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i5-8305G	7788 Points +183%
Asus FX504GD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H	7025 Points +155%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ	6188 Points +125%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7200U	4374 Points +59%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8550U	3547 Points +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	2975 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (2169 - 3031, n=13)	2804 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8550U	2756 Points
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 2500U	2683 Points -3%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U	2650 Points -4%
HP ProBook 470 G5 NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, i5-8250U	1888 Points -31%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	1334 Points -52%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ	58932 Points +375%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i5-8305G	44796 Points +261%
Asus FX504GD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H	38881 Points +213%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7200U	36552 Points +195%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8550U	17743 Points +43%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 2500U	15186 Points +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (12166 - 14880, n=13)	13617 Points +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	13362 Points +8%
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8550U	12406 Points
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U	11986 Points -3%
HP ProBook 470 G5 NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, i5-8250U	9050 Points -27%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	7980 Points -36%
Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 AMD Radeon RX Vega 3, R3 2200U	7049 Points -43%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ	11903 Points +413%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i5-8305G	7355 Points +217%
Asus FX504GD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H	6356 Points +174%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7200U	5705 Points +146%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8550U	2807 Points +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 (2149 - 2495, n=13)	2350 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad 25 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	2340 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 NVIDIA GeForce MX130, i5-8550U	2322 Points
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 2500U	2310 Points -1%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U	2158 Points -7%
HP ProBook 470 G5 NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, i5-8250U	1660 Points -29%
Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 AMD Radeon RX Vega 3, R3 2200U	996 Points -57%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-52T-59HY Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	995 Points -57%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Asus FX504GD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H	200390 Points
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i5-8305G	165559 Points
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 2500U	68150 Points
HP ProBook 470 G5 NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, i5-8250U	59831 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad 25 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	45638 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX130 ()	44243 Points

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 Performance		3077 poäng
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		45310 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		10515 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		2184 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

	låg	med.	hög	ultra
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013)	289	123.2	69.7	34.7
BioShock Infinite (2013)	119.5	69.9	60.5	22.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)	43.9	25.3	14	7.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	37.3	29.2	15.8	12.8
Overwatch (2016)	111.3	75.2	35.6

The Witcher 3 low

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		30.8 / 30.8 / 31 dB(A)
Hög belastning		45.6 / 46.7 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.5 dB(A)

	Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 GeForce MX130, i5-8550U, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8	Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 Vega 3, R3 2200U, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R4W1 Vega 8, R5 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
Noise		0%	5%	6%	6%	5%
off / environment *	28.5	30.6 -7%	30.4 -7%	30.13 -6%	30.3 -6%	31.8 -12%
Idle Minimum *	30.8	31.2 -1%	31.4 -2%	30.13 2%	30.3 2%	31.8 -3%
Idle Average *	30.8	31.2 -1%	31.4 -2%	30.13 2%	30.3 2%	32.1 -4%
Idle Maximum *	31	31.2 -1%	31.6 -2%	30.13 3%	30.3 2%	32.1 -4%
Load Average *	45.6	43.3 5%	31.9 30%	38.8 15%	39.2 14%	33 28%
Witcher 3 ultra *	45.6				41.6 9%
Load Maximum *	46.7	43.3 7%	40.9 12%	38.8 17%	39.2 16%	34.8 25%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


31.4 °C	35.2 °C	34 °C
23.6 °C	30 °C	32 °C
23.2 °C	24.2 °C	28.4 °C

Max: 35.2 °C
Medel: 29.1 °C


30.8 °C	52 °C	34.6 °C
32.6 °C	44.2 °C	27 °C
31 °C	28.6 °C	27 °C

Max: 52 °C
Medel: 34.2 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 44 °C | Rumstemperatur 22.4 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.8 °C / 83.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (0 °C / 0 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.27 / 0.43 Watt
Låg belastning	5.9 / 7 / 8.5 Watt
Hög belastning	54.5 / 55.7 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 i5-8550U, GeForce MX130, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 R3 2200U, Vega 3, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.60	Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB i5-7200U, Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R4W1 R5 2500U, Vega 8, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Power Consumption		7%	10%	-44%	-13%
Idle Minimum *	5.9	3.6 39%	5 15%	9.9 -68%	7.3 -24%
Idle Average *	7	6.8 3%	8.4 -20%	9.5 -36%	9.7 -39%
Idle Maximum *	8.5	9.5 -12%	9.2 -8%	10.7 -26%	13 -53%
Load Average *	54.5	51.6 5%	30 45%	62 -14%	40.4 26%
Witcher 3 ultra *	50.6			84 -66%
Load Maximum *	55.7	56 -1%	44.7 20%	86.7 -56%	42.2 24%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid


WiFi Websurfing		3tim 52min

	Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 i5-8550U, GeForce MX130, 42 Wh	Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 42 Wh	Dell Inspiron 15 5575-98MH4 R3 2200U, Vega 3, 42 Wh	Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, 38 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB i5-7200U, Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), 40 Wh	Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R4W1 R5 2500U, Vega 8, 48 Wh
Battery Runtime		10%	8%	75%	83%	34%
WiFi v1.3	232	255 10%	251 8%	407 75%	425 83%	310 34%
Reader / Idle		423	570		963	730
Load		71	77		50	81

För

+ konsekvent prestanda; endast en viss CPU-strypning vid extrem belastning

+ ganska tunn infattning; litet fotavtryck

+ matt chassi som stöter bort fingeravtryck

+ tyst vid låg processorbelastning

+ respektabel kvalitet på högtalarna

+ skarp och matt IPS-panel

Emot

- förlitar sig fortfarande på propretiär AC-adapter för laddning

- mörk bakgrundsbelysning; medelmåttig synlighet utomhus

- smal färgrymd; dålig återgivning av blått

- svampiga och billiga tangentbordsknappar

- batteritiden har inte förbättrats

- det böjliga locket kunde varit robustare

- högt fläktljud vid spelande

- långsam primär HDD

- ingen Thunderbolt 3

Recenseras: Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Ur prestandasynpunkt är Vivobook F510UF imponerande för sitt pris. Den utgör ett ganska stort hopp från den förra generationens i5-7200U eller i7-7500U utan någon nämnvärd strypning eller påverkan på batteritiden. På samma gång är MX130 GPU:n märkbart bättre än den vanliga UHD Graphics 620 som många mindre Ultrabook-modeller på 13 tum är fast med.

Asus-systemet börjar vackla när vi tittar bortom dess prestanda. Chassit är böjligt och inte i närheten av kvaliteten hos flaggskepp såsom Spectre x360 15 eller XPS 15. Detta inkluderar tangentbordets knappar som känns svampiga och billiga, som om de hörde hemma på en netbook-modell. Även om vi inte förväntar oss den bästa eller mest stabila chassi-designen så förväntar vi oss att tangentbord och styrplatta är representativa för systemets prisnivå. Således finns det fortfarande fler argument för att istället köpa den långsammare och billigare versionen av XPS 15 på grund av dess mycket robustare hölje.

Vårt sista större klagomål rör fläktljudet. Systemfläkten är vid belastning lika högljudd som på en del fullfjädrade spellaptops trots att Vivobook är många gånger långsammare. MX130 GPU:n kommer definitivt med en extra kostnad om man inte planerar att använda den fullt ut.

Andra nackdelar systemet har är typiska i budget-mittenskiktet i den här priskategorin, såsom begränsad färgrymd, medelmåttig batteritid, medelmåttig ljusstyrka och slätstruken design. Vi hoppas att framtida revideringar kommer förbättra tangentbordet, installera en kraftigare kyllösning och byta ut den propretiära AC-anslutningen till förmån för en mer universell laddning via USB Typ C.

CPU, GPU och en matt panel är systemets höjdpunkter och datorn är ett skapligt kap för sitt pris. Man bör känna till dom billiga tangentbordsknapparna, det höga fläktljudet vid spel och den väldigt långsamma primära HDD-enheten. Det kan vara värt att betala 1.000 - 2.000 kronor extra för en mer robust konstruerad instegsversion av XPS 15 istället.

Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 - 2018-06-17 06/17/2018 v6^(old)
Allen Ngo

Design

77 / 98 → 79%

Tangentbord

72%

Mus

84%

Anslutningar

49 / 81 → 61%

Vikt

68 / 20-67 → 100%

Batteri

74%

Skärm

83%

Spelprestanda

68 / 85 → 80%

Programprestanda

93 / 92 → 100%

Temperatur

90%

Ljudnivå

80 / 95 → 84%

Audio

73%

Camera

22 / 85 → 26%

Medel

72%

81%

Multimedia - Vägt medel

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5190 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF (i7-8550U, GeForce MX130) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Allen Ngo, 2018-06-18 (Update: 2018-06-18)